AEMS vs. TLTX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AEMS is a Derivative Income fund managed by Anfield, while TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Over the past year, AEMS returned 27.34% vs 3.72% for TLTX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.

Performance

AEMS vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's -1.59% return.

AEMS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 11.44%
• YTD: 14.93%
• 1Y: 27.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TLTX

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -3.45%
• 6M: -2.30%
• YTD: -1.59%
• 1Y: 3.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEMS vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	14.93%	11.06%
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF	-1.59%	6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and TLTX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

AEMS vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEMS

AEMS Risk / Return Rank: 55
AEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
AEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
AEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
AEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

TLTX

TLTX Risk / Return Rank: 16
TLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
TLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEMS vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEMS	TLTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	0.40	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	0.64	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.08	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	0.59	+1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.08	1.32	+7.76

AEMS vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the TLTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMS and TLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and TLTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMS	TLTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-6.35%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-6.35%	-5.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.91%	-5.23%	-3.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.74%	-2.38%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	2.83%	+0.19%

Volatility

AEMS vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison

Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) has a higher volatility of 12.31% compared to Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX) at 2.87%. This indicates that AEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEMS	TLTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.31%	2.87%	+9.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.91%	6.92%	+10.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.36%	9.24%	+11.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.01%	9.24%	+10.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.01%	9.24%	+10.77%

AEMS vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMS vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 447.11%, more than TLTX's 17.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	447.11%	7.53%
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF	17.73%	7.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMS and TLTX in my portfolio?

AEMS and TLTX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AEMS or TLTX?

AEMS has higher volatility (12.31%) compared to TLTX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEMS dropped -11.37% vs TLTX's -6.35%.

Which ETF is better, AEMS or TLTX?

On 1-year performance, AEMS leads with 27.34% vs 3.72% for TLTX. On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, TLTX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AEMS or TLTX?

Over the 1-year period, AEMS has performed better with a 27.34% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMS or TLTX?

TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AEMS or TLTX?

AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 447.11%, compared with 17.73% for TLTX.

What is the main difference between AEMS and TLTX?

AEMS is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.29% for TLTX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AEMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.