AEMS vs. GOOY

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AEMS returned 27.15% vs 67.98% for GOOY. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOY.

Performance

AEMS vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEMS achieves a 14.93% return, which is significantly lower than GOOY's 16.92% return.

AEMS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -8.91%
• 6M: 12.00%
• YTD: 14.93%
• 1Y: 27.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.85%

GOOY

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: 3.07%
• 6M: 8.67%
• YTD: 16.92%
• 1Y: 67.98%
• 3Y*: 26.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	$0.00	$50.71K	$2.91M
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	$5.25M	$4.67M	$7.68M

AEMS vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	14.93%	11.86%
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	16.92%	58.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AEMS and GOOY is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

AEMS vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AEMS

AEMS Risk / Return Rank: 53
AEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
AEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
AEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 56

GOOY

GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 89
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AEMS vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AEMS	GOOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.66	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	3.59	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.46	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	3.86	-1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	11.43	-3.93

AEMS vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEMS and GOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AEMS vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEMS drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEMS and GOOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AEMS	GOOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-24.40%	+13.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.37%	-17.70%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.91%	-5.96%	-2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.08%	-6.46%	+4.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.63%	5.96%	-2.33%

Volatility

AEMS vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) is 2.27%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 10.97%. This indicates that AEMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AEMS	GOOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.27%	10.97%	-8.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.56%	20.71%	-3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.25%	25.83%	-5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.53%	23.96%	-4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.53%	23.96%	-4.43%

AEMS vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

AEMS vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 447.11%, more than GOOY's 52.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF	447.11%	7.53%	0.00%	0.00%
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	52.41%	41.50%	36.74%	7.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AEMS and GOOY in my portfolio?

AEMS and GOOY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AEMS or GOOY?

GOOY has higher volatility (10.97%) compared to AEMS (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEMS dropped -11.37% vs GOOY's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, AEMS or GOOY?

On 1-year performance, GOOY leads with 67.98% vs 27.15% for AEMS. On fees, GOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AEMS has been the lower-risk option at 2.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AEMS or GOOY?

Over the 1-year period, GOOY has performed better with a 67.98% return vs 27.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AEMS or GOOY?

GOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for AEMS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AEMS or GOOY?

AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 447.11%, compared with 52.41% for GOOY.

What is the main difference between AEMS and GOOY?

They also come from different issuers: Anfield and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 0.99% for GOOY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.