AEMS vs. IPDP
AEMS (Anfield Enhanced Market ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. AEMS charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.
Performance
AEMS vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AEMS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 11.44%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 27.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPDP
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEMS vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 14.58% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEMS vs. IPDP — Risk / Return Rank
AEMS
IPDP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AEMS vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anfield Enhanced Market ETF (AEMS) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AEMS | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AEMS vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEMS | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.91% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.74% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | — | — |
Volatility
AEMS vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEMS | IPDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.36% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | — | — |
AEMS vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AEMS has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
AEMS vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison
AEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 447.11%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AEMS Anfield Enhanced Market ETF | 447.11% | 7.53% |
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AEMS is cheaper at 1.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AEMS is cheaper with a 1.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.
AEMS has the higher dividend yield at 447.11%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.
They also come from different issuers: Anfield and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 1.21% for AEMS and 1.52% for IPDP.
Find the right allocation for AEMS and IPDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer