AEIS vs. CLS
AEIS (Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. AEIS operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, AEIS returned 24.03%/yr vs 45.51%/yr for CLS. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AEIS vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AEIS having a 54.13% return and CLS slightly higher at 54.98%. Over the past 10 years, AEIS has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 24.03%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 45.51% annualized return.
AEIS
- 1D
- 3.27%
- 1M
- -16.65%
- YTD
- 54.13%
- 6M
- 51.19%
- 1Y
- 171.97%
- 3Y*
- 48.52%
- 5Y*
- 26.15%
- 10Y*
- 24.03%
CLS
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 54.98%
- 6M
- 48.55%
- 1Y
- 277.82%
- 3Y*
- 226.85%
- 5Y*
- 121.36%
- 10Y*
- 45.51%
AEIS vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEIS Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | 54.13% | 81.58% | 6.55% | 27.49% | -5.37% | -5.69% | 36.19% | 65.85% | -36.38% | 23.25% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 54.98% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between AEIS and CLS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.44 |
The correlation between AEIS and CLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
AEIS:
$13.61B
CLS:
$53.01B
AEIS:
$4.80
CLS:
$8.28
AEIS:
67.17
CLS:
55.30
AEIS:
1.30
CLS:
0.74
AEIS:
6.72
CLS:
3.84
AEIS:
9.83
CLS:
25.26
AEIS:
$1.91B
CLS:
$13.81B
AEIS:
$737.20M
CLS:
$1.60B
AEIS:
$248.10M
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AEIS vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
AEIS
CLS
AEIS vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AEIS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.46 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.14 | 9.57 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.01 | 24.15 | +1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AEIS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | 3.96 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 2.14 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.92 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.28 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
AEIS vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEIS drawdown since its inception was -92.51%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEIS and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AEIS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.51% | -96.93% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.24% | -29.24% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.87% | -53.96% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.87% | -53.96% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.28% | -80.60% | +18.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.08% | -3.02% | -14.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.30% | -73.38% | +21.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 11.57% | -4.93% |
Volatility
AEIS vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) is 19.62%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 22.24%. This indicates that AEIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AEIS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.62% | 22.24% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.41% | 53.06% | -13.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.99% | 70.76% | -20.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.76% | 57.21% | -14.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.33% | 49.69% | -5.36% |
Dividends
AEIS vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
AEIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEIS Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | 0.12% | 0.19% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.47% | 0.44% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AEIS vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AEIS vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
AEIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 200.90M and revenue of 511.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.3%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
AEIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 68.30M and revenue of 511.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
AEIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 66.80M and revenue of 511.00M, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AEIS and CLS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (22.24%) compared to AEIS (19.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEIS dropped -92.51% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 3.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AEIS and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer