ADVE vs. FLAU

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ADVE (Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF) and FLAU (Franklin FTSE Australia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. ADVE is actively managed, while FLAU is passively managed. Over the past year, ADVE returned 42.25% vs 17.54% for FLAU. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ADVE charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLAU.

Performance

ADVE vs. FLAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVE achieves a 22.27% return, which is significantly higher than FLAU's 11.78% return.

ADVE

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 22.27%
• 6M: 24.39%
• 1Y: 42.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLAU

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 14.79%
• 1Y: 17.54%
• 3Y*: 13.42%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADVE vs. FLAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ADVE Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF	22.27%	26.12%	7.02%	5.13%
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	11.78%	15.95%	1.81%	13.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVE and FLAU is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023	0.73

The correlation between ADVE and FLAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADVE vs. FLAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ADVE	FLAU
Technology	29.0%	1.2%
Financial Services	27.3%	36.0%
Industrials	13.6%	6.4%
Communication Services	9.5%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	6.6%
Real Estate	4.0%	6.4%
Basic Materials	3.4%	26.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	3.7%
Energy	1.2%	5.7%
Utilities	1.1%	0.8%
Healthcare	1.1%	4.9%

Return for Risk

ADVE vs. FLAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADVE

ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 76
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FLAU

FLAU Risk / Return Rank: 32
FLAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FLAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FLAU Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FLAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FLAU Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADVE vs. FLAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ADVE	FLAU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	1.06	+1.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	1.54	+1.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.19	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	1.91	+1.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.74	5.94	+8.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ADVE vs. FLAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the FLAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVE and FLAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ADVE	FLAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	1.06	+1.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.46	0.34	+1.12

Drawdowns

ADVE vs. FLAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVE drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum FLAU drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVE and FLAU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADVE	FLAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.41%	-45.73%	+27.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.73%	-10.01%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.97%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.15%	-6.79%	+3.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.23%	-0.28%

Volatility

ADVE vs. FLAU - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Franklin FTSE Australia ETF (FLAU) at 5.55%. This indicates that ADVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADVE	FLAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.98%	5.55%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.40%	13.63%	+0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.88%	16.64%	+0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.69%	19.60%	-3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	23.58%	-7.89%

ADVE vs. FLAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FLAU's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADVE vs. FLAU - Dividend Comparison

ADVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than FLAU's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ADVE Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF	2.44%	2.97%	6.00%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLAU Franklin FTSE Australia ETF	2.91%	3.25%	3.37%	3.62%	5.91%	5.14%	2.18%	4.37%	4.34%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADVE and FLAU in my portfolio?

ADVE and FLAU have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADVE or FLAU?

ADVE has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to FLAU (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVE dropped -18.41% vs FLAU's -45.73%.

Which ETF is better, ADVE or FLAU?

On 1-year performance, ADVE leads with 42.25% vs 17.54% for FLAU. On fees, FLAU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLAU has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADVE or FLAU?

Over the 1-year period, ADVE has performed better with a 42.25% return vs 17.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADVE or FLAU?

FLAU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADVE or FLAU?

FLAU has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 2.44% for ADVE.

What is the main difference between ADVE and FLAU?

They also come from different issuers: Matthews and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADVE and 0.09% for FLAU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ADVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.