PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADVE vs. JPAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ADVE vs. JPAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVE achieves a 16.97% return, which is significantly higher than JPAN's 15.79% return.


ADVE

1D
-0.99%
1M
1.67%
6M
9.15%
YTD
16.97%
1Y
31.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.19%

JPAN

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.46%
6M
10.42%
YTD
15.79%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.63K$20.43K$28.96K
$44.47K$43.11K$61.89K

ADVE vs. JPAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
16.97%26.12%7.02%4.58%
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
15.79%22.96%18.16%5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVE and JPAN is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

0.73

The correlation between ADVE and JPAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADVE vs. JPAN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ADVE
JPAN

Technology

30.8%
27.7%

Financial Services

28.9%
18.2%

Industrials

11.5%
21.3%

Communication Services

10.7%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
13.8%

Basic Materials

3.8%
4.8%

Real Estate

3.2%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.3%

Healthcare

1.0%
1.9%

Utilities

1.0%

-

Energy

0.8%
0.6%

Technology

ADVE
30.8%
JPAN
27.7%

Financial Services

ADVE
28.9%
JPAN
18.2%

Industrials

ADVE
11.5%
JPAN
21.3%

Communication Services

ADVE
10.7%
JPAN
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ADVE
5.9%
JPAN
13.8%

Basic Materials

ADVE
3.8%
JPAN
4.8%

Real Estate

ADVE
3.2%
JPAN
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

ADVE
2.6%
JPAN
3.3%

Healthcare

ADVE
1.0%
JPAN
1.9%

Utilities

ADVE
1.0%
JPAN

-

Energy

ADVE
0.8%
JPAN
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADVE vs. JPAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ADVE
ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

JPAN
JPAN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JPAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPAN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
JPAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ADVE vs. JPAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADVEJPANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.06

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

7.00

+1.94

ADVE vs. JPAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the JPAN Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVE and JPAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADVE vs. JPAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVE drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, which is greater than JPAN's maximum drawdown of -15.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVE and JPAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADVEJPANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.41%

-15.24%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.73%

-14.59%

+2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.34%

-5.14%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-3.15%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

4.28%

-0.84%

Volatility

ADVE vs. JPAN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) is 6.53%, while Matthews Japan Active ETF (JPAN) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that ADVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADVEJPANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

7.64%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.43%

17.89%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.66%

21.09%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

19.69%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.51%

19.69%

-3.18%

ADVE vs. JPAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ADVE and JPAN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

ADVE vs. JPAN - Dividend Comparison

ADVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than JPAN's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ADVE
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
2.20%2.97%6.00%0.37%
JPAN
Matthews Japan Active ETF
4.41%5.10%1.53%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADVE and JPAN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JPAN has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to ADVE (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVE dropped -18.41% vs JPAN's -15.24%.

On 1-year performance, ADVE leads with 31.66% vs 29.48% for JPAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ADVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ADVE has performed better with a 31.66% return vs 29.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ADVE and JPAN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

JPAN has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 2.20% for ADVE.

ADVE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while JPAN is Japan Equities.

ADVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADVE and JPAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer