ADVE vs. EEMA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ADVE (Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF) and EEMA (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. ADVE is actively managed, while EEMA is passively managed. Over the past year, ADVE returned 31.66% vs 36.15% for EEMA. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ADVE charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EEMA.

Performance

ADVE vs. EEMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADVE achieves a 16.97% return, which is significantly lower than EEMA's 18.44% return.

ADVE

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 1.67%
• 6M: 9.15%
• YTD: 16.97%
• 1Y: 31.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.19%

EEMA

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -2.07%
• 6M: 10.69%
• YTD: 18.44%
• 1Y: 36.15%
• 3Y*: 19.22%
• 5Y*: 7.24%
• 10Y*: 9.33%
• ALL TIME*: 6.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ADVE Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF	$23.63K	$20.43K	$28.96K
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF	$19.41M	$13.70M	$20.34M

ADVE vs. EEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ADVE Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF	16.97%	26.12%	7.02%	4.58%
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF	18.44%	33.27%	10.23%	6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ADVE and EEMA is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.87

The correlation between ADVE and EEMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ADVE vs. EEMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ADVE	EEMA
Technology	30.8%	40.7%
Financial Services	28.9%	17.0%
Industrials	11.5%	8.4%
Communication Services	10.7%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	9.9%
Basic Materials	3.8%	4.8%
Real Estate	3.2%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	2.8%
Healthcare	1.0%	3.9%
Utilities	1.0%	1.7%
Energy	0.8%	2.7%

Return for Risk

ADVE vs. EEMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ADVE

ADVE Risk / Return Rank: 71
ADVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ADVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ADVE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ADVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
ADVE Martin Ratio Rank: 72

EEMA

EEMA Risk / Return Rank: 63
EEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
EEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ADVE vs. EEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ADVE	EEMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.46	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.99	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	2.43	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.94	7.50	+1.44

ADVE vs. EEMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the EEMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADVE and EEMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ADVE vs. EEMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADVE drawdown since its inception was -18.41%, smaller than the maximum EEMA drawdown of -44.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADVE and EEMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADVE	EEMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.41%	-44.18%	+25.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.73%	-14.30%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.34%	-8.62%	+4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-13.88%	+10.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	4.62%	-1.18%

Volatility

ADVE vs. EEMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF (ADVE) is 6.53%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that ADVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ADVE	EEMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.53%	7.90%	-1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.43%	21.26%	-3.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.66%	23.81%	-4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	21.02%	-4.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.51%	21.12%	-4.61%

ADVE vs. EEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADVE has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ADVE vs. EEMA - Dividend Comparison

ADVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than EEMA's 1.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ADVE Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF	2.20%	2.97%	6.00%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF	1.39%	1.48%	1.74%	2.02%	1.78%	2.19%	1.15%	1.86%	2.17%	1.74%	1.74%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADVE and EEMA in my portfolio?

ADVE and EEMA have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ADVE or EEMA?

EEMA has higher volatility (7.90%) compared to ADVE (6.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADVE dropped -18.41% vs EEMA's -44.18%.

Which ETF is better, ADVE or EEMA?

On 1-year performance, EEMA leads with 36.15% vs 31.66% for ADVE. On fees, EEMA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ADVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ADVE or EEMA?

Over the 1-year period, EEMA has performed better with a 36.15% return vs 31.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADVE or EEMA?

EEMA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADVE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADVE or EEMA?

ADVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 1.39% for EEMA.

What is the main difference between ADVE and EEMA?

They also come from different issuers: Matthews and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADVE and 0.50% for EEMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ADVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.