PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADP vs. ATO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADP vs. ATO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADP achieves a -11.51% return, which is significantly lower than ATO's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ADP has outperformed ATO with an annualized return of 12.33%, while ATO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.


ADP

1D
-2.31%
1M
5.59%
YTD
-11.51%
6M
-13.44%
1Y
-25.90%
3Y*
3.26%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
12.33%

ATO

1D
-0.61%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.81%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
10.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADP vs. ATO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADP
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
-11.51%-10.18%28.41%-0.25%-1.29%42.60%5.86%32.71%14.25%16.54%
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
1.49%23.07%23.35%6.17%9.63%12.75%-12.73%23.14%10.39%18.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ADP and ATO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1987

0.27

The correlation between ADP and ATO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADP:

$90.83B

ATO:

$28.23B

EPS

ADP:

$10.72

ATO:

$8.23

PE Ratio

ADP:

21.06

ATO:

20.45

PEG Ratio

ADP:

1.59

ATO:

2.01

PS Ratio

ADP:

4.24

ATO:

5.64

PB Ratio

ADP:

14.30

ATO:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADP:

$21.60B

ATO:

$4.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADP:

$10.26B

ATO:

$1.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADP:

$6.51B

ATO:

$2.57B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADP vs. ATO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADP
ADP Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ADP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADP Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ADP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ATO
ATO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADP vs. ATO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADPATODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.15

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

1.02

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

3.11

-4.39

ADP vs. ATO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADP Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the ATO Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADP and ATO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADP vs. ATO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADP drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, which is greater than ATO's maximum drawdown of -51.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADP and ATO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADPATODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.51%

-51.94%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.16%

-12.58%

-25.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.78%

-16.87%

-23.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-19.08%

-21.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

-32.91%

-7.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.18%

-12.02%

-17.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-8.56%

-4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.34%

4.12%

+16.22%

Volatility

ADP vs. ATO - Volatility Comparison

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) at 5.15%. This indicates that ADP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADPATODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

5.15%

+4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.52%

11.21%

+9.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.27%

15.51%

+8.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.07%

18.59%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.49%

21.24%

+3.25%

Dividends

ADP vs. ATO - Dividend Comparison

ADP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than ATO's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADP
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
2.87%2.46%1.96%2.21%1.83%1.55%2.08%1.92%2.14%2.00%2.10%2.36%
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.30%2.15%2.36%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%

Financials

ADP vs. ATO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and Atmos Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.94B
1.96B
(ADP) Total Revenue
(ATO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ADP vs. ATO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Automatic Data Processing, Inc. and Atmos Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
48.3%
0
Portfolio components
ADP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.87B and revenue of 5.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

ATO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ADP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.79B and revenue of 5.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.1%.

ATO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 764.80M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

ADP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Automatic Data Processing, Inc. reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 5.94B, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.

ATO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a net income of 581.90M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ADP and ATO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADP has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to ATO (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADP dropped -59.51% vs ATO's -51.94%.

ATO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADP and ATO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer