PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADP vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ADP vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADP achieves a -15.25% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ADP has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 11.90%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.88% annualized return.


ADP

1D
-1.74%
1M
-4.03%
YTD
-15.25%
6M
-16.06%
1Y
-27.98%
3Y*
2.50%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*
11.90%

^GSPC

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
9.16%
6M
8.64%
1Y
25.22%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADP vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ADP
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
-15.25%-10.18%28.41%-0.25%-1.29%42.60%5.86%32.71%14.25%16.54%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
9.16%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ADP and ^GSPC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 1983

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between ADP and ^GSPC has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADP vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADP
ADP Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ADP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADP Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADP Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ADP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADP Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADP vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ADP^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.37

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

2.78

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.35

12.44

-13.79

ADP vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ADP Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADP and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ADP vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADP drawdown since its inception was -59.51%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADP and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADP^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.51%

-56.78%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.16%

-9.10%

-29.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.78%

-18.90%

-21.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-25.43%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.78%

-33.92%

-6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.17%

-1.80%

-30.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.60%

-10.71%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.77%

2.03%

+18.74%

Volatility

ADP vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.67%. This indicates that ADP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADP^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.36%

4.67%

+3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.46%

9.84%

+10.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.44%

12.50%

+11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.07%

16.99%

+5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

18.11%

+6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


ADP and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ADP has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to ^GSPC (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADP dropped -59.51% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADP and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer