ADME vs. MNA
ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) and MNA (IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds - ADME tracks the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index while MNA tracks the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ADME returned 8.73%/yr vs 2.92%/yr for MNA. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ADME charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for MNA.
Performance
ADME vs. MNA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a 7.37% return, which is significantly higher than MNA's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ADME has outperformed MNA with an annualized return of 8.73%, while MNA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.92% annualized return.
ADME
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 17.42%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 7.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
MNA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 1.84%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.89%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.92%
ADME vs. MNA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 7.37% | 10.28% | 22.11% | 15.42% | -21.80% | 20.24% | 18.21% | 9.31% | -6.05% | 17.58% |
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 1.84% | 8.59% | 4.93% | 0.18% | -1.61% | -3.24% | 2.72% | 4.70% | 2.13% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADME and MNA is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADME vs. MNA — Risk / Return Rank
ADME
MNA
ADME vs. MNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADME | MNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.17 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 3.19 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.68 | 7.78 | +1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADME vs. MNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than MNA's maximum drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and MNA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADME | MNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.49% | -16.68% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.49% | -1.40% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.67% | -3.01% | -12.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.43% | -10.24% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.49% | -16.68% | -10.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -0.50% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -2.83% | -5.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 0.57% | +1.23% |
Volatility
ADME vs. MNA - Volatility Comparison
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) at 1.36%. This indicates that ADME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADME | MNA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 1.36% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 3.52% | +5.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.73% | 4.75% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 4.97% | +8.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 6.53% | +7.92% |
ADME vs. MNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADME has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MNA's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADME vs. MNA - Dividend Comparison
ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.47% | 0.78% | 0.73% | 0.26% | 0.41% | 0.70% | 0.86% | 0.32% | 0.69% | 0.00% |
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADME and MNA have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADME has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to MNA (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADME dropped -27.49% vs MNA's -16.68%.
On 10-year performance, ADME leads with 8.73% vs 2.92% for MNA. On fees, MNA is cheaper at 0.77% per year. On volatility, MNA has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ADME has performed better with a 8.73% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MNA is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ADME.
ADME has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for MNA.
ADME tracks Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index, while MNA tracks IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. They also come from different issuers: Aptus Capital Advisors and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ADME and 0.77% for MNA.
ADME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADME and MNA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer