PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ADME vs. CLSE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ADME and CLSE is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

ADME vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
19.44%
57.16%
ADME
CLSE

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ADME:

2.18

CLSE:

2.63

Sortino Ratio

ADME:

3.00

CLSE:

3.59

Omega Ratio

ADME:

1.40

CLSE:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

ADME:

2.03

CLSE:

4.71

Martin Ratio

ADME:

14.84

CLSE:

18.37

Ulcer Index

ADME:

1.58%

CLSE:

1.90%

Daily Std Dev

ADME:

10.72%

CLSE:

13.26%

Max Drawdown

ADME:

-27.49%

CLSE:

-14.28%

Current Drawdown

ADME:

-2.82%

CLSE:

-4.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADME achieves a 22.78% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 35.42% return.


ADME

YTD

22.78%

1M

-0.02%

6M

7.49%

1Y

22.81%

5Y*

9.51%

10Y*

N/A

CLSE

YTD

35.42%

1M

-1.47%

6M

6.19%

1Y

34.37%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ADME vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ADME has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.


CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLSE: current value at 1.56% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.56%
Expense ratio chart for ADME: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ADME vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ADME, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.182.63
The chart of Sortino ratio for ADME, currently valued at 3.00, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.003.59
The chart of Omega ratio for ADME, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.401.46
The chart of Calmar ratio for ADME, currently valued at 3.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.094.71
The chart of Martin ratio for ADME, currently valued at 14.84, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.8418.37
ADME
CLSE

The current ADME Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ADME and CLSE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.18
2.63
ADME
CLSE

Dividends

ADME vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

ADME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than CLSE's 0.93% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016
ADME
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
0.56%0.78%0.74%0.26%0.41%0.69%0.86%0.32%0.69%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.93%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ADME vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADME drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -14.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADME and CLSE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-2.82%
-4.20%
ADME
CLSE

Volatility

ADME vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is 3.21%, while Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that ADME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.21%
5.51%
ADME
CLSE
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab