ADIV vs. IEFA
ADIV (SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF) and IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADIV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson Asset Management, while IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net). ADIV is actively managed, while IEFA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ADIV returned 5.91%/yr vs 7.82%/yr for IEFA. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ADIV charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IEFA.
Performance
ADIV vs. IEFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADIV achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly lower than IEFA's 7.49% return.
ADIV
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- —
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
ADIV vs. IEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF | 4.50% | 21.86% | 14.47% | 12.28% | -18.00% | 1.50% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 7.49% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 6.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADIV and IEFA is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ADIV and IEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
ADIV vs. IEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ADIV
IEFA
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
ADIV
IEFA
Technology
ADIV
IEFA
Consumer Cyclical
ADIV
IEFA
Real Estate
ADIV
IEFA
Healthcare
ADIV
IEFA
Consumer Defensive
ADIV
IEFA
Communication Services
ADIV
IEFA
Utilities
ADIV
IEFA
Industrials
ADIV
IEFA
Basic Materials
ADIV
-
IEFA
Energy
ADIV
-
IEFA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADIV vs. IEFA — Risk / Return Rank
ADIV
IEFA
ADIV vs. IEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ADIV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 1.71 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.66 | 6.52 | -1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ADIV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.30 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.47 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.50 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
ADIV vs. IEFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADIV drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, smaller than the maximum IEFA drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADIV and IEFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADIV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -34.78% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -11.50% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.53% | -13.76% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.55% | -30.41% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.40% | -2.44% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.44% | -6.69% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 3.02% | +0.07% |
Volatility
ADIV vs. IEFA - Volatility Comparison
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) at 4.54%. This indicates that ADIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADIV | IEFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 4.54% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.02% | 12.74% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.87% | 15.22% | -1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 16.55% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 17.32% | -0.91% |
ADIV vs. IEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADIV has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than IEFA's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADIV vs. IEFA - Dividend Comparison
ADIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than IEFA's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF | 2.88% | 2.77% | 4.83% | 4.55% | 2.98% | 13.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.30% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADIV and IEFA have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ADIV has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to IEFA (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ADIV dropped -31.55% vs IEFA's -34.78%.
On 5-year performance, IEFA leads with 7.82% vs 5.91% for ADIV. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IEFA has performed better with a 7.82% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ADIV.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.88% for ADIV.
ADIV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson Asset Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for ADIV and 0.07% for IEFA.
IEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ADIV and IEFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer