ADIV vs. GARA
ADIV (SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF) and GARA (Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ADIV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while GARA is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson. Both are actively managed. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ADIV charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GARA.
Performance
ADIV vs. GARA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ADIV achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than GARA's 11.16% return.
ADIV
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 14.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.03%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.88%
GARA
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $158.48K | $98.50K | $105.95K | |
| $890.80 | $714.64 | $1.92K |
ADIV vs. GARA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF | 9.55% | 0.21% |
GARA Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF | 11.16% | 1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ADIV and GARA is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ADIV vs. GARA — Risk / Return Rank
ADIV
GARA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ADIV vs. GARA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) and Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ADIV | GARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ADIV vs. GARA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ADIV drawdown since its inception was -31.55%, which is greater than GARA's maximum drawdown of -7.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADIV and GARA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ADIV | GARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.55% | -7.87% | -23.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.96% | -1.63% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -1.67% | -6.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | — | — |
Volatility
ADIV vs. GARA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ADIV | GARA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.23% | 12.66% | +1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 12.66% | +3.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.35% | 12.66% | +3.69% |
ADIV vs. GARA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ADIV has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GARA's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ADIV vs. GARA - Dividend Comparison
ADIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than GARA's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADIV SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF | 2.87% | 2.77% | 4.83% | 4.55% | 2.98% | 13.85% |
GARA Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ADIV and GARA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GARA is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GARA is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ADIV.
ADIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 1.55% for GARA.
ADIV is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GARA is Global Equity Income. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for ADIV and 0.45% for GARA.
Find the right allocation for ADIV and GARA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer