ADBG vs. CRWG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) and CRWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

ADBG vs. CRWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADBG achieves a -54.70% return, which is significantly lower than CRWG's 25.17% return.

ADBG

• 1D: -5.32%
• 1M: -1.91%
• YTD: -54.70%
• 6M: -54.25%
• 1Y: -71.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRWG

• 1D: -14.30%
• 1M: -51.29%
• YTD: 25.17%
• 6M: -24.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADBG vs. CRWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	-54.70%	1.84%
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	25.17%	-83.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ADBG and CRWG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2025	-0.02

Return for Risk

ADBG vs. CRWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADBG

ADBG Risk / Return Rank: 1
ADBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Omega Ratio Rank: 0
ADBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ADBG Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADBG vs. CRWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF (CRWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ADBG	CRWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ADBG	CRWG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.93	-0.45	-0.48

Drawdowns

ADBG vs. CRWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADBG drawdown since its inception was -76.71%, smaller than the maximum CRWG drawdown of -89.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADBG and CRWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ADBG	CRWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.71%	-89.42%	+12.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.49%	-81.30%	+8.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.84%	-68.64%	+26.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ADBG	CRWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.29%	191.53%	-124.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.90%	191.53%	-124.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.90%	191.53%	-124.63%

ADBG vs. CRWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ADBG and CRWG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

ADBG vs. CRWG - Dividend Comparison

ADBG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.

Position	TTM	2025
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
CRWG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRWV Daily ETF	5.91%	7.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ADBG and CRWG in my portfolio?

ADBG and CRWG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ADBG or CRWG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ADBG or CRWG?

ADBG and CRWG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ADBG or CRWG?

CRWG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.00% for ADBG.