ACYS vs. KNG

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACYS is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by First Trust, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. ACYS is actively managed, while KNG is passively managed. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

ACYS vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACYS

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

KNG

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 1.67%
• 6M: 4.78%
• YTD: 9.40%
• 1Y: 10.60%
• 3Y*: 7.08%
• 5Y*: 5.92%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	$8.48M	$7.66M	$5.85M
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF	$16.56M	$15.93M	$14.54M

ACYS vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	1.95%
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF	6.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ACYS and KNG is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	-0.06

Return for Risk

ACYS vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KNG

KNG Risk / Return Rank: 37
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACYS vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACYS	KNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.99	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.54	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.24	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.10	—

Drawdowns

ACYS vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACYS drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACYS and KNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACYS	KNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.78%	-35.12%	+34.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.61%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.16%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.16%	-4.09%	+3.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.44%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACYS	KNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.70%	10.76%	-7.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.70%	13.63%	-9.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.70%	17.12%	-13.42%

ACYS vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ACYS and KNG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

ACYS vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than KNG's 8.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF	8.22%	8.61%	9.08%	5.91%	4.00%	3.45%	3.62%	4.09%	3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACYS and KNG in my portfolio?

ACYS and KNG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACYS or KNG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACYS or KNG?

ACYS and KNG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACYS or KNG?

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.22%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between ACYS and KNG?

ACYS is categorized as Derivative Income, while KNG is Dividend.