ACWX vs. VNQ
ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWX returned 9.87%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for VNQ. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VNQ.
Performance
ACWX vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 11.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 9.87%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.
ACWX
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VNQ
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.04%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
ACWX vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 13.42% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 11.49% | 3.24% | 4.81% | 11.85% | -26.25% | 40.54% | -4.61% | 28.91% | -6.03% | 4.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWX and VNQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008 | 0.57 |
The correlation between ACWX and VNQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACWX vs. VNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWX
VNQ
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
ACWX
VNQ
Technology
ACWX
VNQ
Industrials
ACWX
VNQ
Consumer Cyclical
ACWX
VNQ
-
Healthcare
ACWX
VNQ
-
Basic Materials
ACWX
VNQ
Consumer Defensive
ACWX
VNQ
-
Energy
ACWX
VNQ
Communication Services
ACWX
VNQ
Utilities
ACWX
VNQ
-
Real Estate
ACWX
VNQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWX vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank
ACWX
VNQ
ACWX vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWX | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.17 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 1.50 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 4.71 | +4.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWX vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and VNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWX | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.40% | -73.07% | +12.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -8.34% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -17.46% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.07% | -34.48% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -42.40% | +7.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -0.49% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -13.61% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.65% | +0.33% |
Volatility
ACWX vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 4.74%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWX | VNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 4.74% | +2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 9.74% | +4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 13.52% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 18.85% | -2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 20.72% | -3.29% |
ACWX vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWX vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison
ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than VNQ's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.49% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF | 3.57% | 3.92% | 3.85% | 3.95% | 3.91% | 2.56% | 3.93% | 3.39% | 4.74% | 4.23% | 4.82% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWX and VNQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to VNQ (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs VNQ's -73.07%.
On 10-year performance, ACWX leads with 9.87% vs 5.53% for VNQ. On fees, VNQ is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWX has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VNQ is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.
VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 2.49% for ACWX.
ACWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VNQ is REIT. ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.13% for VNQ.
ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWX and VNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer