PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWX vs. HFXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWX vs. HFXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly lower than HFXI's 16.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWX has underperformed HFXI with an annualized return of 10.06%, while HFXI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.98% annualized return.


ACWX

1D
-3.17%
1M
0.91%
YTD
12.88%
6M
12.78%
1Y
29.85%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
10.06%

HFXI

1D
-3.31%
1M
1.55%
YTD
16.19%
6M
16.56%
1Y
34.83%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWX vs. HFXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
12.88%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
16.19%30.10%7.58%19.56%-10.71%13.96%6.88%23.67%-12.69%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWX and HFXI is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015

0.89

The correlation between ACWX and HFXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWX vs. HFXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWX
HFXI

Technology

23.8%
14.6%

Financial Services

23.7%
22.8%

Industrials

13.6%
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

6.6%
5.9%

Healthcare

6.5%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
6.3%

Communication Services

4.6%
3.5%

Energy

4.4%
3.6%

Utilities

2.9%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.5%

Technology

ACWX
23.8%
HFXI
14.6%

Financial Services

ACWX
23.7%
HFXI
22.8%

Industrials

ACWX
13.6%
HFXI
20.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWX
7.0%
HFXI
7.7%

Basic Materials

ACWX
6.6%
HFXI
5.9%

Healthcare

ACWX
6.5%
HFXI
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

ACWX
5.0%
HFXI
6.3%

Communication Services

ACWX
4.6%
HFXI
3.5%

Energy

ACWX
4.4%
HFXI
3.6%

Utilities

ACWX
2.9%
HFXI
3.6%

Real Estate

ACWX
1.3%
HFXI
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWX vs. HFXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

HFXI
HFXI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HFXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFXI Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HFXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWX vs. HFXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACWXHFXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.23

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.05

12.64

-2.60

ACWX vs. HFXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the HFXI Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWX and HFXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACWX vs. HFXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, which is greater than HFXI's maximum drawdown of -32.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and HFXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWXHFXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.40%

-32.42%

-27.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-10.84%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-13.52%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.78%

-22.35%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-32.42%

-2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-3.31%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-5.44%

-7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.76%

+0.22%

Volatility

ACWX vs. HFXI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) have volatilities of 7.37% and 7.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWXHFXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.37%

7.21%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

14.05%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

16.00%

+0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.53%

15.12%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

16.57%

+0.70%

ACWX vs. HFXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than HFXI's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWX vs. HFXI - Dividend Comparison

ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than HFXI's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.54%2.82%2.97%2.96%2.68%2.74%1.88%3.22%2.60%2.40%2.77%2.51%
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
3.33%4.19%2.68%2.49%4.65%3.10%2.00%3.19%4.33%2.56%2.71%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ACWX and HFXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACWX has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to HFXI (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs HFXI's -32.42%.

On 10-year performance, HFXI leads with 11.98% vs 10.06% for ACWX. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HFXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HFXI has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.54% for ACWX.

ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.20% for HFXI.

HFXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWX and HFXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer