ACWX vs. DHS
ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWX returned 9.87%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for DHS. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACWX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
ACWX vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ACWX having a 13.42% return and DHS slightly lower at 12.81%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWX having a 9.87% annualized return and DHS not far behind at 9.75%.
ACWX
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
DHS
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
ACWX vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 13.42% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 10.29% | 21.05% | -13.99% | 27.20% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 12.81% | 12.87% | 18.02% | -0.19% | 7.97% | 23.20% | -5.70% | 22.59% | -7.41% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWX and DHS is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACWX and DHS has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ACWX vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWX
DHS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
ACWX
DHS
Technology
ACWX
DHS
Industrials
ACWX
DHS
Consumer Cyclical
ACWX
DHS
Healthcare
ACWX
DHS
Basic Materials
ACWX
DHS
Consumer Defensive
ACWX
DHS
Energy
ACWX
DHS
Communication Services
ACWX
DHS
Utilities
ACWX
DHS
Real Estate
ACWX
DHS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWX vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
ACWX
DHS
ACWX vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACWX | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.58 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 13.09 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACWX vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWX | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.40% | -67.25% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -6.30% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -11.87% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.07% | -15.28% | -14.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | -37.35% | +1.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | -0.00% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -9.54% | -3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 1.72% | +1.26% |
Volatility
ACWX vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 3.07%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWX | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 3.07% | +3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.36% | 7.35% | +7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 10.02% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 13.90% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 16.08% | +1.35% |
ACWX vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWX vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than DHS's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.49% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWX and DHS have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWX has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to DHS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs DHS's -67.25%.
On 10-year performance, ACWX leads with 9.87% vs 9.75% for DHS. On fees, ACWX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ACWX has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.49% for ACWX.
ACWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.38% for DHS.
DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWX and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer