PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWX vs. CWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWX vs. CWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACWX having a 13.36% return and CWI slightly higher at 13.37%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ACWX having a 9.34% annualized return and CWI not far ahead at 9.70%.


ACWX

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.03%
6M
7.51%
YTD
13.36%
1Y
28.82%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
9.34%
ALL TIME*
4.91%

CWI

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.10%
6M
7.85%
YTD
13.37%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
9.70%
ALL TIME*
5.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$158.12M$125.34M$130.78M
$9.74M$9.97M$9.68M

ACWX vs. CWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
13.36%32.59%5.17%15.63%-16.07%7.67%10.29%21.05%-13.99%27.20%
CWI
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
13.37%32.75%6.27%15.74%-15.39%8.81%9.83%21.92%-13.83%26.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWX and CWI is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.98

The correlation between ACWX and CWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACWX vs. CWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWX
CWI

Financial Services

25.3%
18.4%

Technology

21.1%
15.6%

Industrials

14.1%
8.0%

Healthcare

7.0%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
5.4%

Basic Materials

6.6%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
2.5%

Energy

4.9%
4.9%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.7%

Utilities

3.0%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
0.9%

Financial Services

ACWX
25.3%
CWI
18.4%

Technology

ACWX
21.1%
CWI
15.6%

Industrials

ACWX
14.1%
CWI
8.0%

Healthcare

ACWX
7.0%
CWI
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWX
6.9%
CWI
5.4%

Basic Materials

ACWX
6.6%
CWI
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

ACWX
5.1%
CWI
2.5%

Energy

ACWX
4.9%
CWI
4.9%

Communication Services

ACWX
4.1%
CWI
2.7%

Utilities

ACWX
3.0%
CWI
1.2%

Real Estate

ACWX
1.3%
CWI
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWX vs. CWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ACWX
ACWX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ACWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CWI
CWI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ACWX vs. CWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACWXCWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.48

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

9.12

-0.03

ACWX vs. CWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the CWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWX and CWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACWX vs. CWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, roughly equal to the maximum CWI drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and CWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWXCWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.40%

-60.77%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.42%

-11.47%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-13.85%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.78%

-28.80%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

-34.64%

-0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-2.61%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.24%

-12.77%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.12%

0.00%

Volatility

ACWX vs. CWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) have volatilities of 5.41% and 5.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWXCWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

5.63%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.45%

15.27%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

17.17%

+0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

16.57%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

17.04%

+0.23%

ACWX vs. CWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than CWI's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWX vs. CWI - Dividend Comparison

ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than CWI's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.53%2.82%2.97%2.96%2.68%2.74%1.88%3.22%2.60%2.40%2.77%2.51%
CWI
State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
2.72%2.97%2.89%2.80%3.17%2.65%2.07%3.05%2.81%2.29%2.45%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, ACWX and CWI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CWI has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to ACWX (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs CWI's -60.77%.

On 10-year performance, CWI leads with 9.70% vs 9.34% for ACWX. On fees, CWI is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ACWX has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CWI has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 9.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CWI is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.

CWI has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.53% for ACWX.

ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while CWI tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.30% for CWI.

CWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWX and CWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer