ACWX vs. BKIE
ACWX (iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ACWX tracks the MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACWX returned 8.79%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for BKIE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACWX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
ACWX vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWX achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 9.43% return.
ACWX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 15.52%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- 1Y
- 32.87%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
BKIE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- 12.83%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.74%
- 5Y*
- 9.43%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWX vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 15.52% | 32.59% | 5.17% | 15.63% | -16.07% | 7.67% | 38.87% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 9.43% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWX and BKIE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between ACWX and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
ACWX vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWX
BKIE
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
ACWX
BKIE
Technology
ACWX
BKIE
Industrials
ACWX
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
ACWX
BKIE
Healthcare
ACWX
BKIE
Basic Materials
ACWX
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
ACWX
BKIE
Energy
ACWX
BKIE
Communication Services
ACWX
BKIE
Utilities
ACWX
BKIE
Real Estate
ACWX
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWX vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
ACWX
BKIE
ACWX vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWX | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.14 | 1.59 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 2.26 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.28 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.12 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.72 | 8.19 | +3.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWX | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.59 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.93 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
ACWX vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWX drawdown since its inception was -60.40%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWX and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWX | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.40% | -28.19% | -32.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -11.41% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.84% | -13.19% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.07% | -28.19% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.45% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.34% | -4.98% | -8.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.95% | -0.02% |
Volatility
ACWX vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 4.53%. This indicates that ACWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWX | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 4.53% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.22% | 12.14% | +1.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.50% | 14.57% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 16.12% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.38% | 16.34% | +1.04% |
ACWX vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWX vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
ACWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than BKIE's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWX iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF | 2.44% | 2.82% | 2.97% | 2.96% | 2.68% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 3.22% | 2.60% | 2.40% | 2.77% | 2.51% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, ACWX and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ACWX has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to BKIE (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACWX dropped -60.40% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.43% vs 8.79% for ACWX. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWX.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.44% for ACWX.
ACWX tracks MSCI All Country World ex-U.S. Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ACWX and 0.04% for BKIE.
ACWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACWX and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer