ACWU.L vs. VUG
ACWU.L (Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACWU.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VUG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L returned 12.61%/yr vs 18.25%/yr for VUG. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACWU.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
ACWU.L vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWU.L achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 12.61%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.25% annualized return.
ACWU.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 11.52%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 28.39%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.12%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
VUG
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.25%
ACWU.L vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWU.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD | 11.52% | 22.66% | 17.03% | 21.98% | -18.69% | 19.16% | 16.15% | 26.85% | -10.03% | 23.31% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.78% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 27.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACWU.L and VUG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, ACWU.L and VUG have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.
ACWU.L vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACWU.L
VUG
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ACWU.L
VUG
Financial Services
ACWU.L
VUG
Industrials
ACWU.L
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
ACWU.L
VUG
Communication Services
ACWU.L
VUG
Healthcare
ACWU.L
VUG
Consumer Defensive
ACWU.L
VUG
Energy
ACWU.L
VUG
Basic Materials
ACWU.L
VUG
Utilities
ACWU.L
VUG
Real Estate
ACWU.L
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACWU.L vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
ACWU.L
VUG
ACWU.L vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACWU.L | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.31 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.68 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 5.90 | +7.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACWU.L | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.76 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.69 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 0.85 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.62 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
ACWU.L vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACWU.L | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -50.68% | +16.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -16.53% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.17% | -22.85% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.08% | -35.61% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -35.61% | +1.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -1.25% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -7.09% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 4.71% | -2.59% |
Volatility
ACWU.L vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 3.88% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACWU.L | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 3.81% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 12.11% | -2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 15.83% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.17% | 22.21% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 21.44% | +0.01% |
ACWU.L vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACWU.L vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
ACWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWU.L Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACWU.L and VUG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.
ACWU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. ACWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWU.L and 0.03% for VUG.
Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer