PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWU.L vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACWU.L vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWU.L achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.78% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 12.61%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.25% annualized return.


ACWU.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.16%
YTD
11.52%
6M
12.86%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
12.61%

VUG

1D
0.26%
1M
5.75%
YTD
9.78%
6M
8.99%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
26.10%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*
18.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWU.L vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWU.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD
11.52%22.66%17.03%21.98%-18.69%19.16%16.15%26.85%-10.03%23.31%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.78%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWU.L and VUG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.32

Over the past year, ACWU.L and VUG have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.32, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ACWU.L vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACWU.L
VUG

Technology

29.3%
53.5%

Financial Services

16.2%
4.3%

Industrials

10.9%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
12.2%

Communication Services

9.0%
17.3%

Healthcare

8.1%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
1.5%

Energy

4.2%
0.4%

Basic Materials

3.7%
0.6%

Utilities

2.6%
0.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.0%

Technology

ACWU.L
29.3%
VUG
53.5%

Financial Services

ACWU.L
16.2%
VUG
4.3%

Industrials

ACWU.L
10.9%
VUG
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ACWU.L
9.3%
VUG
12.2%

Communication Services

ACWU.L
9.0%
VUG
17.3%

Healthcare

ACWU.L
8.1%
VUG
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

ACWU.L
5.0%
VUG
1.5%

Energy

ACWU.L
4.2%
VUG
0.4%

Basic Materials

ACWU.L
3.7%
VUG
0.6%

Utilities

ACWU.L
2.6%
VUG
0.9%

Real Estate

ACWU.L
1.8%
VUG
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWU.L vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWU.L
ACWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWU.L vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWU.LVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.31

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

1.68

+1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

5.90

+7.46

ACWU.L vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWU.L and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWU.LVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

1.76

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.69

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.85

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.62

+0.28

Drawdowns

ACWU.L vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWU.LVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-50.68%

+16.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-16.53%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.17%

-22.85%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

-35.61%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-35.61%

+1.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-1.25%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-7.09%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

4.71%

-2.59%

Volatility

ACWU.L vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) have volatilities of 3.88% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWU.LVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

3.81%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

12.11%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

15.83%

-3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

22.21%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

21.44%

+0.01%

ACWU.L vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACWU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACWU.L vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

ACWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWU.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWU.L and VUG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ACWU.L.

ACWU.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. ACWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ACWU.L and 0.03% for VUG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer