PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACWU.L vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ACWU.L vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACWU.L achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWU.L has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 12.61%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.65% annualized return.


ACWU.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.16%
YTD
11.52%
6M
12.86%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
12.61%

^GSPC

1D
0.41%
1M
4.48%
YTD
10.79%
6M
10.60%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACWU.L vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACWU.L
Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD
11.52%22.66%17.03%21.98%-18.69%19.16%16.15%26.85%-10.03%23.31%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.79%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ACWU.L and ^GSPC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2014

0.34

Over the past year, ACWU.L and ^GSPC have become more correlated (0.68) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACWU.L vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACWU.L
ACWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACWU.L vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACWU.L^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.98

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

13.78

-0.42

ACWU.L vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACWU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACWU.L and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACWU.L^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.28

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.74

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

0.76

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.47

+0.42

Drawdowns

ACWU.L vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWU.L and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACWU.L^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-56.78%

+22.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-9.10%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.17%

-18.90%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

-25.43%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

-33.92%

+0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.33%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.78%

-10.72%

+5.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.97%

+0.15%

Volatility

ACWU.L vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI All Country World UCITS C-USD (ACWU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.88%. This indicates that ACWU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACWU.L^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

2.88%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

9.00%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

11.89%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.17%

16.90%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.45%

18.06%

+3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACWU.L and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACWU.L and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer