ACVF vs. TRND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACVF (American Conservative Values ETF) and TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ACVF is actively managed, while TRND is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACVF returned 12.39%/yr vs 6.25%/yr for TRND. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACVF charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for TRND.

Performance

ACVF vs. TRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ACVF having a 10.58% return and TRND slightly lower at 10.17%.

ACVF

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 19.62%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: —

TRND

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 10.19%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 11.89%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACVF vs. TRND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	10.58%	13.67%	20.56%	23.81%	-15.74%	28.84%	13.79%
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	10.17%	6.03%	11.97%	16.48%	-15.37%	12.95%	12.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ACVF and TRND is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020	0.88

The correlation between ACVF and TRND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ACVF vs. TRND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ACVF	TRND
Technology	39.7%	30.6%
Financial Services	11.6%	13.2%
Industrials	11.0%	13.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.1%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	5.5%
Communication Services	4.2%	7.7%
Energy	3.5%	3.8%
Utilities	2.2%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.7%	2.7%
Basic Materials	1.6%	3.4%

Return for Risk

ACVF vs. TRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVF

ACVF Risk / Return Rank: 54
ACVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ACVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ACVF Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ACVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ACVF Martin Ratio Rank: 60

TRND

TRND Risk / Return Rank: 58
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACVF vs. TRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACVF	TRND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.94	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.75	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	2.72	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.75	11.41	-0.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACVF vs. TRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACVF Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the TRND Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVF and TRND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACVF	TRND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	1.94	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.65	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	0.65	+0.37

Drawdowns

ACVF vs. TRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, which is greater than TRND's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and TRND.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACVF	TRND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.39%	-17.88%	-6.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.70%	-8.00%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	-9.56%	-7.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.39%	-16.21%	-8.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-0.38%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-5.22%	+0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	1.90%	-0.01%

Volatility

ACVF vs. TRND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is 3.06%, while Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that ACVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACVF	TRND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.06%	3.56%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.00%	8.97%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.41%	11.23%	+0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.23%	9.71%	+6.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.97%	11.18%	+4.79%

ACVF vs. TRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TRND's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACVF vs. TRND - Dividend Comparison

ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than TRND's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ACVF American Conservative Values ETF	0.53%	0.59%	0.59%	0.82%	0.93%	0.61%	0.23%	0.00%
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	2.10%	2.32%	2.31%	2.51%	1.76%	0.93%	0.60%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACVF and TRND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ACVF and TRND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ACVF or TRND?

TRND has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to ACVF (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACVF dropped -24.39% vs TRND's -17.88%.

Which ETF is better, ACVF or TRND?

On 5-year performance, ACVF leads with 12.39% vs 6.25% for TRND. On fees, ACVF is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ACVF has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACVF or TRND?

Over the 5-year period, ACVF has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACVF or TRND?

ACVF is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACVF or TRND?

TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.53% for ACVF.

What is the main difference between ACVF and TRND?

They also come from different issuers: Ridgeline Research LLC and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACVF and 0.77% for TRND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.