PortfoliosLab logo
ACVF vs. AOA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ACVF and AOA is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

ACVF vs. AOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
84.39%
49.01%
ACVF
AOA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACVF:

0.64

AOA:

0.66

Sortino Ratio

ACVF:

1.02

AOA:

1.01

Omega Ratio

ACVF:

1.14

AOA:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

ACVF:

0.71

AOA:

0.71

Martin Ratio

ACVF:

2.80

AOA:

3.17

Ulcer Index

ACVF:

4.27%

AOA:

2.88%

Daily Std Dev

ACVF:

18.60%

AOA:

13.94%

Max Drawdown

ACVF:

-24.39%

AOA:

-28.38%

Current Drawdown

ACVF:

-5.08%

AOA:

-2.74%

Returns By Period


ACVF

YTD

0.00%

1M

14.10%

6M

-4.44%

1Y

11.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AOA

YTD

1.58%

1M

11.72%

6M

-0.84%

1Y

9.16%

5Y*

10.78%

10Y*

7.43%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ACVF vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACVF has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACVF vs. AOA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACVF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACVF is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACVF is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACVF is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACVF is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACVF is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACVF is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AOA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AOA is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AOA is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AOA is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AOA is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AOA is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AOA is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACVF vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ACVF Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the AOA Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACVF and AOA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.64
0.66
ACVF
AOA

Dividends

ACVF vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison

ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than AOA's 2.28% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
0.61%0.59%0.83%0.93%0.61%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AOA
iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF
2.28%2.30%2.22%2.10%1.67%1.71%2.50%2.37%5.09%2.02%2.15%2.18%

Drawdowns

ACVF vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACVF drawdown since its inception was -24.39%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACVF and AOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-5.08%
-2.74%
ACVF
AOA

Volatility

ACVF vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison

American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a higher volatility of 10.36% compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) at 7.49%. This indicates that ACVF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10.36%
7.49%
ACVF
AOA