PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACTV vs. GXTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACTV vs. GXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACTV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GXTG

1D
-2.35%
1M
8.75%
YTD
25.21%
6M
20.12%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
6.51%
5Y*
-7.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACTV vs. GXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ACTV
LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF
0.00%3.13%-1.70%15.22%-19.33%25.52%27.02%
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
25.21%3.52%-3.55%10.26%-48.08%3.21%21.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ACTV and GXTG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2020

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between ACTV and GXTG has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ACTV vs. GXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACTV
GXTG

Financial Services

98.5%
2.3%

Technology

30.1%
22.3%

Communication Services

12.3%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
11.5%

Real Estate

9.3%
6.9%

Healthcare

7.1%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%

-

Industrials

6.6%
8.0%

Utilities

3.0%
12.4%

Energy

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%
14.4%

Financial Services

ACTV
98.5%
GXTG
2.3%

Technology

ACTV
30.1%
GXTG
22.3%

Communication Services

ACTV
12.3%
GXTG
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ACTV
12.0%
GXTG
11.5%

Real Estate

ACTV
9.3%
GXTG
6.9%

Healthcare

ACTV
7.1%
GXTG
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

ACTV
6.8%
GXTG

-

Industrials

ACTV
6.6%
GXTG
8.0%

Utilities

ACTV
3.0%
GXTG
12.4%

Energy

ACTV
2.1%
GXTG

-

Basic Materials

ACTV
1.2%
GXTG
14.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACTV vs. GXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACTV

GXTG
GXTG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACTV vs. GXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF (ACTV) and Global X Thematic Growth ETF (GXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACTV vs. GXTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACTVGXTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

Drawdowns

ACTV vs. GXTG - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACTVGXTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.35%

Volatility

ACTV vs. GXTG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACTVGXTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.59%

ACTV vs. GXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACTV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GXTG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACTV vs. GXTG - Dividend Comparison

ACTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than GXTG's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ACTV
LeaderShares Activist Leaders ETF
1.28%1.28%0.80%1.18%0.28%7.63%0.11%0.00%
GXTG
Global X Thematic Growth ETF
1.12%1.40%1.08%1.99%1.48%1.56%0.48%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACTV and GXTG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXTG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXTG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACTV.

ACTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.12% for GXTG.

They also come from different issuers: Redwood and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ACTV and 0.50% for GXTG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACTV and GXTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer