ACTS vs. RHRX
ACTS (FIS Tactical Equity ETF) and RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACTS charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for RHRX.
Performance
ACTS vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACTS
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHRX
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 16.59%
- YTD
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 30.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACTS vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACTS FIS Tactical Equity ETF | 13.11% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 14.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACTS and RHRX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACTS vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank
ACTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RHRX
ACTS vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACTS | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACTS vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACTS drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACTS and RHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACTS | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -25.33% | +17.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.06% | -3.45% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -8.82% | +6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.90% | — |
Volatility
ACTS vs. RHRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACTS | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.74% | 14.20% | +13.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.74% | 19.07% | +8.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.74% | 19.07% | +8.67% |
ACTS vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACTS has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACTS vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACTS nor RHRX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACTS and RHRX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACTS is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACTS is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.
ACTS and RHRX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ACTS and 1.36% for RHRX.
Find the right allocation for ACTS and RHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer