ACTS vs. GMOD

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

ACTS (FIS Tactical Equity ETF) and GMOD (GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACTS charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GMOD.

Performance

ACTS vs. GMOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ACTS

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: 2.48%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GMOD

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.65%
• 6M: 5.60%
• YTD: 7.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACTS vs. GMOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ACTS FIS Tactical Equity ETF	13.11%
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ACTS and GMOD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026	0.70

Return for Risk

ACTS vs. GMOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) and GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF (GMOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

ACTS vs. GMOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACTS drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, which is greater than GMOD's maximum drawdown of -6.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACTS and GMOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACTS	GMOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.03%	-6.50%	-1.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.06%	-0.56%	-5.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.56%	-1.11%	-1.45%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACTS	GMOD	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.74%	8.92%	+18.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.74%	8.92%	+18.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.74%	8.92%	+18.82%

ACTS vs. GMOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACTS has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOD's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACTS vs. GMOD - Dividend Comparison

ACTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GMOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.

Position	TTM	2025
ACTS FIS Tactical Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%
GMOD GMO Dynamic Allocation ETF	1.37%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACTS and GMOD in my portfolio?

ACTS and GMOD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACTS or GMOD?

On fees, GMOD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACTS or GMOD?

GMOD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ACTS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACTS or GMOD?

GMOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for ACTS.

What is the main difference between ACTS and GMOD?

They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ACTS and 0.50% for GMOD.