PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACTS vs. WAMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACTS vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ACTS

1D
-2.76%
1M
2.48%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WAMA

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.56%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACTS vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACTS and WAMA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACTS vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACTS vs. WAMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACTS vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACTS drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -5.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACTS and WAMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACTSWAMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-5.73%

-2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.06%

-1.28%

-4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.56%

-1.46%

-1.10%

Volatility

ACTS vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACTSWAMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.74%

13.94%

+13.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.74%

13.94%

+13.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.74%

13.94%

+13.80%

ACTS vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACTS has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACTS vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison

ACTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WAMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ACTS and WAMA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ACTS.

WAMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for ACTS.

They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ACTS and 0.32% for WAMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACTS and WAMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer