ACTS vs. WAMA
ACTS (FIS Tactical Equity ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. ACTS is actively managed, while WAMA is passively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACTS charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
ACTS vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACTS
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACTS vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACTS FIS Tactical Equity ETF | 13.11% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 7.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACTS and WAMA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACTS vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACTS vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACTS drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -5.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACTS and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACTS | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -5.73% | -2.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.06% | -1.28% | -4.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -1.46% | -1.10% |
Volatility
ACTS vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACTS | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.74% | 13.94% | +13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.74% | 13.94% | +13.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.74% | 13.94% | +13.80% |
ACTS vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACTS has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACTS vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
ACTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WAMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ACTS FIS Tactical Equity ETF | 0.00% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACTS and WAMA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ACTS.
WAMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for ACTS.
They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ACTS and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for ACTS and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer