ACTS vs. ASGM
ACTS (FIS Tactical Equity ETF) and ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACTS charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for ASGM.
Performance
ACTS vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACTS
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASGM
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 13.15%
- YTD
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACTS vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACTS FIS Tactical Equity ETF | 13.11% |
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 8.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACTS and ASGM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACTS vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FIS Tactical Equity ETF (ACTS) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACTS vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACTS drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACTS and ASGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACTS | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -6.62% | -1.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.06% | -5.15% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -1.50% | -1.06% |
Volatility
ACTS vs. ASGM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACTS | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.74% | 17.00% | +10.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.74% | 17.00% | +10.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.74% | 17.00% | +10.74% |
ACTS vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACTS has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACTS vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison
ACTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACTS FIS Tactical Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 3.87% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACTS and ASGM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACTS is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACTS is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.
ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.00% for ACTS.
They also come from different issuers: Faith Investor Services and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for ACTS and 0.86% for ASGM.
Find the right allocation for ACTS and ASGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer