ACSV vs. XSVM
ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index. ACSV is actively managed, while XSVM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for XSVM.
Performance
ACSV vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly lower than XSVM's 16.87% return.
ACSV
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XSVM
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
ACSV vs. XSVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 14.95% | 2.82% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 16.87% | 4.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSV and XSVM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSV vs. XSVM — Risk / Return Rank
ACSV
XSVM
ACSV vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.94 | 0.36 | +1.57 |
Drawdowns
ACSV vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and XSVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -62.57% | +55.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -1.47% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -11.57% | +9.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.27% | — |
Volatility
ACSV vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSV | XSVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.92% | 18.59% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 22.71% | -6.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 25.09% | -9.17% |
ACSV vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XSVM's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSV vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than XSVM's 1.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 0.52% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.81% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSV and XSVM have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSVM is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSVM is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSV.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.52% for ACSV.
ACSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while XSVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.37% for XSVM.
Find the right allocation for ACSV and XSVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer