ACSV vs. QGRO
ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and QGRO (American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while QGRO is a Quality Factor fund tracking the American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index. ACSV is actively managed, while QGRO is passively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QGRO.
Performance
ACSV vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 24.39% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's 1.31% return.
ACSV
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 17.21%
- YTD
- 24.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QGRO
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.28%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $125.82K | $120.30K | $121.30K | |
| $8.71M | $8.72M | $14.21M |
ACSV vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 24.39% | 0.92% |
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 1.31% | 1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSV and QGRO is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSV vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank
ACSV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QGRO
ACSV vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACSV | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.90 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACSV vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum QGRO drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and QGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSV | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -32.56% | +25.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.05% | +2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -7.56% | +5.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.13% | — |
Volatility
ACSV vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSV | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.83% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 16.20% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 21.21% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 22.83% | -7.05% |
ACSV vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSV vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison
ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than QGRO's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 0.79% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.18% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSV and QGRO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSV.
ACSV has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.18% for QGRO.
ACSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while QGRO is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.29% for QGRO.
Find the right allocation for ACSV and QGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer