ACSV vs. FDG
ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDG.
Performance
ACSV vs. FDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 19.42% return, which is significantly higher than FDG's 2.10% return.
ACSV
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 19.42%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDG
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 23.89%
- 3Y*
- 26.18%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSV vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 19.42% | 0.92% |
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 2.10% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSV and FDG is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSV vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank
ACSV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDG
ACSV vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACSV | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.53 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACSV vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and FDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSV | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -43.69% | +36.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -8.01% | +7.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -13.35% | +11.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.63% | — |
Volatility
ACSV vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSV | FDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.24% | 19.12% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 24.87% | -8.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 24.98% | -8.74% |
ACSV vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSV vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison
ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF | 0.83% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSV and FDG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSV.
ACSV has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.
ACSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FDG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.45% for FDG.
Find the right allocation for ACSV and FDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer