ACSV vs. FDG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and FDG (American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while FDG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Century. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDG.

Performance

ACSV vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than FDG's 7.52% return.

ACSV

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDG

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 9.17%
• 1Y: 31.12%
• 3Y*: 29.27%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSV vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF	14.95%	2.82%
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	7.52%	4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSV and FDG is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

ACSV vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDG

FDG Risk / Return Rank: 46
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSV vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACSV	FDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.94	0.92	+1.02

Drawdowns

ACSV vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and FDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACSV	FDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-43.69%	+36.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.71%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-3.13%	+2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-13.43%	+11.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACSV	FDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.92%	17.77%	-1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.92%	24.67%	-8.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.92%	24.90%	-8.98%

ACSV vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACSV vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while FDG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF	0.52%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDG American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACSV and FDG in my portfolio?

ACSV and FDG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACSV or FDG?

On fees, FDG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACSV or FDG?

FDG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACSV or FDG?

ACSV has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for FDG.

What is the main difference between ACSV and FDG?

ACSV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FDG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.45% for FDG.