ACSV vs. RZV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACSV (American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF) and RZV (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. ACSV is actively managed, while RZV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RZV.

Performance

ACSV vs. RZV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACSV achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly lower than RZV's 17.78% return.

ACSV

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 14.95%
• 6M: 14.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RZV

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 3.13%
• YTD: 17.78%
• 6M: 15.59%
• 1Y: 42.30%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 8.85%
• 10Y*: 10.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACSV vs. RZV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF	14.95%	2.82%
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF	17.78%	2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ACSV and RZV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

ACSV vs. RZV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZV

RZV Risk / Return Rank: 61
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACSV vs. RZV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACSV	RZV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.94	0.27	+1.67

Drawdowns

ACSV vs. RZV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACSV drawdown since its inception was -7.39%, smaller than the maximum RZV drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSV and RZV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACSV	RZV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-77.11%	+69.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-60.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-1.04%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-13.60%	+11.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACSV	RZV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.21%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.92%	20.69%	-4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.92%	24.37%	-8.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.92%	27.04%	-11.12%

ACSV vs. RZV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACSV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RZV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACSV vs. RZV - Dividend Comparison

ACSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than RZV's 1.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACSV American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF	0.52%	0.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF	1.35%	1.59%	1.14%	1.13%	1.43%	0.86%	0.63%	1.03%	2.03%	1.02%	0.46%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACSV and RZV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ACSV and RZV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ACSV or RZV?

On fees, RZV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACSV or RZV?

RZV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACSV or RZV?

RZV has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.52% for ACSV.

What is the main difference between ACSV and RZV?

They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSV and 0.35% for RZV.