ACSMX vs. EMCAX
ACSMX (Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund) and EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACSMX returned 1.13%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for EMCAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSMX charges 1.95%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for EMCAX.
Performance
ACSMX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSMX achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly lower than EMCAX's 4.13% return.
ACSMX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -3.82%
- 1Y
- 8.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- —
EMCAX
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 6M
- 2.83%
- 1Y
- 13.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
ACSMX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | -4.16% | 4.92% | 15.29% | 22.38% | -28.60% | 6.89% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 4.13% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 1.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSMX and EMCAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ACSMX and EMCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSMX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank
ACSMX
EMCAX
ACSMX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACSMX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 1.02 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 1.53 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.18 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 1.61 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 6.24 | -4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSMX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.02 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.15 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.45 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
ACSMX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSMX drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than EMCAX's maximum drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSMX and EMCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSMX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.41% | -51.81% | -46.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.04% | -8.60% | -7.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.41% | -30.60% | -67.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.13% | -1.80% | -96.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -13.32% | -23.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 2.22% | +3.60% |
Volatility
ACSMX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison
Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 5.53%. This indicates that ACSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACSMX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 5.53% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 10.96% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 14.38% | +3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,831.52% | 18.22% | +2,813.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,814.79% | 20.21% | +2,794.58% |
ACSMX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSMX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSMX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison
ACSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% |