ACSMX vs. ETEGX
ACSMX (Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund) and ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACSMX returned 0.74%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for ETEGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSMX charges 1.95%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ETEGX.
Performance
ACSMX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSMX achieves a -5.22% return, which is significantly lower than ETEGX's 1.65% return.
ACSMX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -5.22%
- 6M
- -6.05%
- 1Y
- 0.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
ETEGX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- -1.65%
- 3Y*
- 4.76%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
ACSMX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | -5.22% | 4.92% | 15.29% | 22.38% | -28.60% | 6.89% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 1.65% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | -15.52% | 10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSMX and ETEGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2021 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ACSMX and ETEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSMX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank
ACSMX
ETEGX
ACSMX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACSMX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.99 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | -0.15 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | -0.34 | +0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSMX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | -0.12 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.09 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.28 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
ACSMX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSMX drawdown since its inception was -35.01%, smaller than the maximum ETEGX drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSMX and ETEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSMX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.01% | -67.58% | +32.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.04% | -13.05% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.82% | -19.98% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -24.30% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.44% | -10.24% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.65% | -22.76% | +8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | 5.79% | +0.99% |
Volatility
ACSMX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) is 4.10%, while Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that ACSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSMX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 4.45% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 11.11% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 16.05% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 18.77% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 19.84% | +0.87% |
ACSMX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSMX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSMX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison
ACSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 8.09% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSMX and ETEGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETEGX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to ACSMX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSMX dropped -35.01% vs ETEGX's -67.58%.
ACSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACSMX and ETEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer