EMCAX vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both funds - EMCAX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Empiric Funds, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Over the past 10 years, EMCAX returned 10.97%/yr vs 47.00%/yr for TQQQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMCAX charges 1.96%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.

Performance

EMCAX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCAX achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 56.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EMCAX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 10.97%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 47.00% annualized return.

EMCAX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 6M: 10.29%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 12.53%
• 5Y*: 4.83%
• 10Y*: 10.97%

TQQQ

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 6.09%
• YTD: 56.90%
• 6M: 52.71%
• 1Y: 129.55%
• 3Y*: 63.58%
• 5Y*: 24.47%
• 10Y*: 47.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCAX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	13.26%	2.37%	13.89%	12.43%	-16.06%	16.07%	27.81%	19.10%	-4.64%	21.82%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	56.90%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCAX and TQQQ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010	0.73

The correlation between EMCAX and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EMCAX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCAX

EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 68
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCAX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMCAX	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	2.49	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.72	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.36	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	3.53	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.73	11.25	-2.53

EMCAX vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCAX and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMCAX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCAX drawdown since its inception was -51.81%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCAX and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMCAX	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.81%	-81.66%	+29.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-36.97%	+28.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.19%	-58.04%	+38.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.60%	-81.66%	+51.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.79%	-81.66%	+38.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-5.32%	+3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.25%	-18.50%	+5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.29%	11.56%	-9.27%

Volatility

EMCAX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) is 4.03%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 25.07%. This indicates that EMCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMCAX	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	25.07%	-21.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.57%	42.17%	-30.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.45%	52.51%	-38.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.19%	67.26%	-49.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.24%	66.36%	-46.12%

EMCAX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCAX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMCAX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than TQQQ's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund	0.12%	0.13%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.51%	7.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.38%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMCAX and TQQQ in my portfolio?

EMCAX and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EMCAX or TQQQ?

TQQQ has higher volatility (25.07%) compared to EMCAX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCAX dropped -51.81% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.