ACSMX vs. FECGX
ACSMX (Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund) and FECGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACSMX returned 1.13%/yr vs 3.06%/yr for FECGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACSMX charges 1.95%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FECGX.
Performance
ACSMX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSMX achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly lower than FECGX's 4.98% return.
ACSMX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -3.82%
- 1Y
- 8.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- —
FECGX
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 7.57%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSMX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | -4.16% | 4.92% | 15.29% | 22.38% | -28.60% | 6.89% |
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 4.98% | 13.04% | 15.26% | 18.90% | -26.17% | -4.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSMX and FECGX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ACSMX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSMX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank
ACSMX
FECGX
ACSMX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACSMX | FECGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 1.97 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 2.72 | -1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.33 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 2.62 | -2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 9.48 | -8.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSMX | FECGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 1.97 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.13 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.33 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
ACSMX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSMX drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSMX and FECGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSMX | FECGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.41% | -41.85% | -56.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.04% | -14.81% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.41% | -40.34% | -58.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.13% | -4.08% | -94.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -16.07% | -20.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 4.08% | +1.74% |
Volatility
ACSMX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) is 6.23%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that ACSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACSMX | FECGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 8.34% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 16.94% | -3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 21.63% | -3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,831.52% | 24.55% | +2,806.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,814.79% | 27.30% | +2,787.49% |
ACSMX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSMX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSMX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison
ACSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FECGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FECGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.54% | 1.25% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 3.43% | 1.00% | 0.29% |