PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMCAX vs. AOFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMCAX vs. AOFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) and Alger Small Cap Focus Fund (AOFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMCAX achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than AOFIX's 15.97% return. Over the past 10 years, EMCAX has outperformed AOFIX with an annualized return of 10.97%, while AOFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.


EMCAX

1D
0.54%
1M
3.08%
YTD
13.26%
6M
10.29%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
12.53%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
10.97%

AOFIX

1D
2.16%
1M
9.26%
YTD
15.97%
6M
11.99%
1Y
37.64%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
-3.34%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMCAX vs. AOFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EMCAX
Empiric 2500 Fund
13.26%2.37%13.89%12.43%-16.06%16.07%27.81%19.10%-4.64%21.82%
AOFIX
Alger Small Cap Focus Fund
15.97%6.96%13.76%9.88%-37.62%-14.06%53.29%24.16%14.16%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EMCAX and AOFIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2008

0.82

The correlation between EMCAX and AOFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMCAX vs. AOFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMCAX
EMCAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EMCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
EMCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

AOFIX
AOFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
AOFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
AOFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMCAX vs. AOFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) and Alger Small Cap Focus Fund (AOFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EMCAXAOFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.87

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.73

6.18

+2.55

EMCAX vs. AOFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the AOFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMCAX and AOFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EMCAX vs. AOFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMCAX drawdown since its inception was -51.81%, smaller than the maximum AOFIX drawdown of -60.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMCAX and AOFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMCAXAOFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.81%

-60.19%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-19.88%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-31.97%

+12.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-55.64%

+25.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

-60.19%

+17.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-28.98%

+27.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-19.45%

+6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

6.00%

-3.71%

Volatility

EMCAX vs. AOFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) is 4.03%, while Alger Small Cap Focus Fund (AOFIX) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that EMCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMCAXAOFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

8.88%

-4.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

20.87%

-9.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.45%

26.48%

-12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.19%

28.21%

-10.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

26.40%

-6.16%

EMCAX vs. AOFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMCAX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than AOFIX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMCAX vs. AOFIX - Dividend Comparison

EMCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while AOFIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AOFIX
Alger Small Cap Focus Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.94%0.00%2.36%0.85%
EMCAX
Empiric 2500 Fund
0.12%0.13%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.51%7.46%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMCAX and AOFIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOFIX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to EMCAX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMCAX dropped -51.81% vs AOFIX's -60.19%.

AOFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMCAX and AOFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer