ACSMX vs. DMCRX
ACSMX (Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund) and DMCRX (Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACSMX returned 1.13%/yr vs 8.61%/yr for DMCRX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACSMX charges 1.95%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for DMCRX.
Performance
ACSMX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSMX achieves a -4.16% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 12.48% return.
ACSMX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- -4.16%
- 6M
- -3.82%
- 1Y
- 8.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.13%
- 10Y*
- —
DMCRX
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 88.78%
- 3Y*
- 29.10%
- 5Y*
- 8.61%
- 10Y*
- 21.57%
ACSMX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | -4.16% | 4.92% | 15.29% | 22.38% | -28.60% | 6.89% |
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 12.48% | 31.17% | 30.58% | 11.47% | -33.54% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSMX and DMCRX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2021 | 0.76 |
The correlation between ACSMX and DMCRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSMX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank
ACSMX
DMCRX
ACSMX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACSMX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.55 | 3.32 | -2.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 3.78 | -2.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.49 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 6.91 | -6.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.39 | 24.85 | -23.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSMX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 | 3.32 | -2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.22 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.57 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
ACSMX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSMX drawdown since its inception was -98.41%, which is greater than DMCRX's maximum drawdown of -59.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSMX and DMCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSMX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.41% | -59.16% | -39.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.04% | -15.46% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.41% | -59.16% | -39.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.13% | -1.86% | -96.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.52% | -20.31% | -16.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 4.30% | +1.52% |
Volatility
ACSMX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund (ACSMX) is 6.23%, while Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that ACSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ACSMX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 11.12% | -4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 23.30% | -9.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 28.21% | -10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,831.52% | 39.55% | +2,791.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2,814.79% | 33.90% | +2,780.89% |
ACSMX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSMX has a 1.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSMX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison
ACSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.20%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSMX Advisors Capital Small/Mid Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 12.20% | 13.72% | 3.86% | 0.87% | 8.20% | 48.23% | 19.79% | 14.70% | 33.22% | 8.91% | 0.00% | 4.20% |