ACSI vs. SPYG
ACSI (American Customer Satisfaction ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSI is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACSI returned 9.08%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for SPYG. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACSI charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
ACSI vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSI achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.70% return.
ACSI
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 10.67%
- 1Y
- 19.62%
- 3Y*
- 18.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
ACSI vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 10.57% | 10.70% | 22.51% | 21.06% | -20.93% | 23.33% | 22.93% | 24.88% | -4.97% | 15.77% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSI and SPYG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ACSI and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACSI vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACSI
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
ACSI
SPYG
Communication Services
ACSI
SPYG
Technology
ACSI
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
ACSI
SPYG
Financial Services
ACSI
SPYG
Healthcare
ACSI
SPYG
Industrials
ACSI
SPYG
Utilities
ACSI
SPYG
Energy
ACSI
SPYG
Basic Materials
ACSI
-
SPYG
Real Estate
ACSI
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSI vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
ACSI
SPYG
ACSI vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACSI | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 1.96 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.78 | 7.79 | +1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACSI vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSI drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSI and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSI | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.49% | -67.63% | +33.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -13.76% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.27% | -22.14% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.86% | -32.67% | +7.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -5.52% | +3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -24.28% | +18.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 3.46% | -1.45% |
Volatility
ACSI vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Customer Satisfaction ETF (ACSI) is 4.09%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that ACSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSI | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 7.26% | -3.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 13.90% | -4.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 17.26% | -5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 21.36% | -4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 20.73% | -3.33% |
ACSI vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSI has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSI vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
ACSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSI American Customer Satisfaction ETF | 0.83% | 0.91% | 0.69% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.82% | 1.64% | 1.59% | 1.20% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSI and SPYG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to ACSI (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACSI dropped -34.49% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 14.11% vs 9.08% for ACSI. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ACSI has been the lower-risk option at 4.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 9.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for ACSI.
ACSI has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.
ACSI is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. ACSI tracks American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Exponential ETFs and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for ACSI and 0.04% for SPYG.
ACSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACSI and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer