ACSG vs. QINT
ACSG (American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF) and QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACSG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while QINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. ACSG is actively managed, while QINT is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACSG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for QINT.
Performance
ACSG vs. QINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACSG achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than QINT's 7.74% return.
ACSG
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QINT
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 23.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.47%
- 10Y*
- —
ACSG vs. QINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACSG American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF | 11.29% | 1.17% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 7.74% | 5.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACSG and QINT is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025 | 0.71 |
ACSG vs. QINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACSG
QINT
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
ACSG
QINT
Healthcare
ACSG
QINT
Technology
ACSG
QINT
Consumer Cyclical
ACSG
QINT
Financial Services
ACSG
QINT
Basic Materials
ACSG
QINT
Energy
ACSG
QINT
Communication Services
ACSG
QINT
Real Estate
ACSG
QINT
Consumer Defensive
ACSG
QINT
Utilities
ACSG
QINT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACSG vs. QINT — Risk / Return Rank
ACSG
QINT
ACSG vs. QINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACSG | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.56 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
ACSG vs. QINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACSG drawdown since its inception was -13.28%, smaller than the maximum QINT drawdown of -33.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACSG and QINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACSG | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -33.86% | +20.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -2.47% | -1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -7.54% | +4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.83% | — |
Volatility
ACSG vs. QINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACSG | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.66% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 15.03% | +7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 16.25% | +6.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 18.08% | +4.47% |
ACSG vs. QINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACSG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QINT's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACSG vs. QINT - Dividend Comparison
ACSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACSG American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.54% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACSG and QINT have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QINT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QINT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ACSG.
QINT has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.00% for ACSG.
ACSG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while QINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ACSG and 0.39% for QINT.
Find the right allocation for ACSG and QINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer