PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACLS vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACLS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACLS achieves a 98.15% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ACLS has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 30.54%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 21.94% annualized return.


ACLS

1D
0.26%
1M
12.21%
YTD
98.15%
6M
80.86%
1Y
168.58%
3Y*
-0.66%
5Y*
30.84%
10Y*
30.54%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACLS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
98.15%14.98%-46.13%63.42%6.44%156.04%20.83%35.39%-37.98%97.25%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ACLS and QQQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2000

0.55

The correlation between ACLS and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACLS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACLS
ACLS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ACLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACLS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACLSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

3.51

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.03

13.49

+1.54

ACLS vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACLS Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACLS and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACLSQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

2.64

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.81

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.99

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.41

-0.38

Drawdowns

ACLS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACLS drawdown since its inception was -99.34%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLS and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACLSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.34%

-82.97%

-16.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.20%

-11.96%

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.84%

-22.77%

-56.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.84%

-35.12%

-43.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.84%

-35.12%

-43.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.60%

-0.26%

-20.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.37%

-32.79%

-39.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.26%

3.11%

+8.15%

Volatility

ACLS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (ACLS) has a higher volatility of 25.94% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that ACLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACLSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.94%

4.49%

+21.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.82%

12.10%

+33.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.01%

15.94%

+41.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.63%

22.38%

+32.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.35%

22.29%

+31.06%

Dividends

ACLS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

ACLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACLS
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACLS and QQQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACLS has higher volatility (25.94%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLS dropped -99.34% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

ACLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACLS and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer