ACLC vs. QINT
ACLC (American Century Large Cap Equity ETF) and QINT (American Century Quality Diversified International ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while QINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Alpha Vee American Century Diversified International Equity Index. ACLC is actively managed, while QINT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACLC returned 10.97%/yr vs 8.81%/yr for QINT. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.
Performance
ACLC vs. QINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACLC achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than QINT's 9.42% return.
ACLC
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 6M
- 7.84%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
QINT
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 25.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.81%
- 10Y*
- —
ACLC vs. QINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 8.74% | 11.80% | 19.96% | 24.74% | -19.37% | 28.97% | 17.32% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 9.42% | 38.12% | 6.53% | 20.36% | -19.75% | 9.29% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACLC and QINT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ACLC and QINT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACLC vs. QINT — Risk / Return Rank
ACLC
QINT
ACLC vs. QINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACLC | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.26 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 9.14 | +0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACLC | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 1.74 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.55 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.57 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
ACLC vs. QINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACLC drawdown since its inception was -26.44%, smaller than the maximum QINT drawdown of -33.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACLC and QINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACLC | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.44% | -33.86% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.28% | -11.41% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.49% | -13.56% | -6.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.44% | -33.86% | +7.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.95% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -7.55% | +1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 2.82% | -0.54% |
Volatility
ACLC vs. QINT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Century Large Cap Equity ETF (ACLC) is 2.93%, while American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that ACLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACLC | QINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 4.84% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 12.35% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 14.84% | -2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 16.22% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 18.06% | -0.94% |
ACLC vs. QINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ACLC and QINT have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Dividends
ACLC vs. QINT - Dividend Comparison
ACLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than QINT's 2.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACLC American Century Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.10% | 0.72% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QINT American Century Quality Diversified International ETF | 2.50% | 2.66% | 3.49% | 3.12% | 3.56% | 2.30% | 1.61% | 1.83% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACLC and QINT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QINT has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to ACLC (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACLC dropped -26.44% vs QINT's -33.86%.
On 5-year performance, ACLC leads with 10.97% vs 8.81% for QINT. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, ACLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACLC has performed better with a 10.97% return vs 8.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACLC and QINT have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.
QINT has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.56% for ACLC.
ACLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities.
ACLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACLC and QINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer