PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACKY vs. QRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACKY vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACKY achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's 2.60% return.


ACKY

1D
-0.72%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
-3.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QRMI

1D
0.20%
1M
1.85%
YTD
2.60%
6M
3.95%
1Y
9.73%
3Y*
7.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACKY vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ACKY and QRMI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.68

ACKY vs. QRMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ACKY
QRMI

Consumer Cyclical

44.7%
12.2%

Communication Services

30.9%
15.8%

Real Estate

22.5%
0.1%

Industrials

1.8%
2.8%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.2%

Technology

0.0%
53.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ACKY
44.7%
QRMI
12.2%

Communication Services

ACKY
30.9%
QRMI
15.8%

Real Estate

ACKY
22.5%
QRMI
0.1%

Industrials

ACKY
1.8%
QRMI
2.8%

Financial Services

ACKY
0.0%
QRMI
0.2%

Technology

ACKY
0.0%
QRMI
53.8%

Basic Materials

ACKY

-

QRMI
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

ACKY

-

QRMI
7.7%

Energy

ACKY

-

QRMI
0.6%

Healthcare

ACKY

-

QRMI
4.2%

Utilities

ACKY

-

QRMI
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACKY vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACKY

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACKY vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF (ACKY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ACKY vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACKYQRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.22

-0.22

Drawdowns

ACKY vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACKY drawdown since its inception was -14.63%, smaller than the maximum QRMI drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACKY and QRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACKYQRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-20.95%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

0.00%

-5.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-7.98%

+4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

Volatility

ACKY vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACKYQRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

5.76%

+9.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.14%

8.34%

+6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

8.34%

+6.80%

ACKY vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACKY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACKY vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

ACKY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, which matches QRMI's 12.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ACKY
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Select Income ETF
12.07%5.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.19%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACKY and QRMI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ACKY.

QRMI has the higher dividend yield at 12.19%, compared with 12.07% for ACKY.

ACKY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QRMI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ACKY and 0.60% for QRMI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACKY and QRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer