ACGR vs. BBHL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACGR (American Century Large Cap Growth ETF) and BBHL (BBH Select Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ACGR tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index while BBHL tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACGR charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BBHL.

Performance

ACGR vs. BBHL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACGR achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than BBHL's 5.40% return.

ACGR

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 6.90%
• 1Y: 24.19%
• 3Y*: 21.44%
• 5Y*: 15.06%
• 10Y*: —

BBHL

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 3.91%
• YTD: 5.40%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACGR vs. BBHL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF	7.39%	1.86%
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	5.40%	2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ACGR and BBHL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

ACGR vs. BBHL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACGR

ACGR Risk / Return Rank: 40
ACGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
ACGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
ACGR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ACGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ACGR Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACGR vs. BBHL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Large Cap Growth ETF (ACGR) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACGR	BBHL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACGR	BBHL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	1.26	-0.57

Drawdowns

ACGR vs. BBHL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACGR drawdown since its inception was -34.54%, which is greater than BBHL's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGR and BBHL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACGR	BBHL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.54%	-11.99%	-22.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-0.53%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-3.01%	-5.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.66%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACGR	BBHL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.95%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.49%	12.70%	+2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.51%	12.70%	+8.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.42%	12.70%	+8.72%

ACGR vs. BBHL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACGR has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHL's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACGR vs. BBHL - Dividend Comparison

ACGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while BBHL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACGR American Century Large Cap Growth ETF	0.09%	0.11%	0.23%	0.37%	0.48%	0.58%	1.44%
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACGR and BBHL in my portfolio?

ACGR and BBHL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACGR or BBHL?

On fees, ACGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACGR or BBHL?

ACGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BBHL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACGR or BBHL?

ACGR has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for BBHL.

What is the main difference between ACGR and BBHL?

ACGR tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, while BBHL tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: American Century and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ACGR and 0.71% for BBHL.