ACGL vs. SSRM
ACGL (Arch Capital Group Ltd.) and SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.) are both stocks. ACGL operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services), while SSRM operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, ACGL returned 15.70%/yr vs 6.63%/yr for SSRM. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ACGL vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACGL achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 16.88% return. Over the past 10 years, ACGL has outperformed SSRM with an annualized return of 15.70%, while SSRM has yielded a comparatively lower 6.63% annualized return.
ACGL
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.23%
SSRM
- 1D
- -3.97%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- YTD
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 114.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $213.28M | $189.90M | $217.00M | |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | $78.06M | $81.55M | $92.56M |
ACGL vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 4.81% | 3.87% | 30.76% | 18.30% | 41.24% | 23.23% | -15.90% | 60.52% | -11.69% | 5.19% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 16.88% | 214.94% | -35.32% | -29.94% | -10.02% | -10.90% | 4.41% | 59.31% | 37.54% | -1.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACGL and SSRM is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 1996 | 0.06 |
The correlation between ACGL and SSRM shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ACGL:
$35.12B
SSRM:
$5.32B
ACGL:
$12.85
SSRM:
$3.26
ACGL:
7.82
SSRM:
7.85
ACGL:
0.18
SSRM:
0.12
ACGL:
1.91
SSRM:
2.93
ACGL:
1.51
SSRM:
1.26
ACGL:
$19.20B
SSRM:
$1.90B
ACGL:
$6.56B
SSRM:
$643.76M
ACGL:
$5.60B
SSRM:
$835.27M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACGL vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank
ACGL
SSRM
ACGL vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACGL | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.28 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 3.68 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 8.07 | -4.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACGL vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACGL drawdown since its inception was -54.70%, smaller than the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACGL and SSRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACGL | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.70% | -91.68% | +36.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -31.28% | +17.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.43% | -73.41% | +50.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.43% | -83.16% | +60.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.84% | -83.16% | +29.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.96% | -41.14% | +33.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.71% | -57.06% | +45.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 14.23% | -8.82% |
Volatility
ACGL vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) is 8.78%, while SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a volatility of 17.57%. This indicates that ACGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACGL | SSRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.78% | 17.57% | -8.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 55.14% | -38.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.43% | 68.57% | -47.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 56.61% | -32.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 53.15% | -25.52% |
Dividends
ACGL vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison
Neither ACGL nor SSRM has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACGL Arch Capital Group Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSRM SSR Mining Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.60% | 1.79% | 1.13% |
Financials
ACGL vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arch Capital Group Ltd. and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ACGL vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison
ACGL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Arch Capital Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of -30.00M and revenue of 4.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.7%.
SSRM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ACGL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Arch Capital Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 46.00M and revenue of 4.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
SSRM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.
ACGL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Arch Capital Group Ltd. reported a net income of 1.06B and revenue of 4.47B, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
SSRM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ACGL and SSRM have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSRM has higher volatility (17.57%) compared to ACGL (8.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACGL dropped -54.70% vs SSRM's -91.68%.
SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACGL and SSRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer