ACEI vs. QFLR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

ACEI (Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACEI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Innovator, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ACEI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

ACEI vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACEI) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACEI achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's 6.01% return.

ACEI

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 0.70%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QFLR

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 2.28%
• 6M: 4.16%
• YTD: 6.01%
• 1Y: 20.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACEI vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACEI Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF	1.08%	0.65%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	6.01%	4.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ACEI and QFLR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

ACEI vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACEI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 60
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACEI vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACEI) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACEI	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.52	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.07	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.04	—

Drawdowns

ACEI vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACEI drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEI and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACEI	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.77%	-13.97%	+7.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.40%	-1.30%	-3.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-2.51%	+0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ACEI	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.52%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.12%	13.31%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.12%	13.25%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	13.25%	-0.13%

ACEI vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACEI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACEI vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

ACEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACEI Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF	8.60%	2.11%	0.00%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACEI and QFLR in my portfolio?

ACEI and QFLR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ACEI or QFLR?

On fees, ACEI is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACEI or QFLR?

ACEI is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACEI or QFLR?

ACEI has the higher dividend yield at 8.60%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.

What is the main difference between ACEI and QFLR?

ACEI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACEI and 0.89% for QFLR.