ACEI vs. FFTY
ACEI (Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) and FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACEI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Innovator, while FFTY is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. ACEI is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ACEI charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.
Performance
ACEI vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACEI achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 9.54% return.
ACEI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FFTY
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -7.92%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 12.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- -2.63%
- 10Y*
- 5.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $528.76K | $545.59K | $524.47K | |
| $903.57K | $1.03M | $1.48M |
ACEI vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ACEI Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | 1.87% | 0.65% |
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 9.54% | -5.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACEI and FFTY is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACEI vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank
ACEI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FFTY
ACEI vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACEI) and CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACEI | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.09 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACEI vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACEI drawdown since its inception was -9.30%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEI and FFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACEI | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.30% | -59.46% | +50.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -22.80% | +19.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -22.32% | +19.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.63% | — |
Volatility
ACEI vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACEI | FFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.61% | 36.23% | -22.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 29.76% | -16.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 27.80% | -14.19% |
ACEI vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACEI has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACEI vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
ACEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, more than FFTY's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEI Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | 9.72% | 2.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 1.23% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACEI and FFTY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACEI is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACEI is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
ACEI has the higher dividend yield at 9.72%, compared with 1.23% for FFTY.
ACEI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FFTY is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and CapForce. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACEI and 0.80% for FFTY.
Find the right allocation for ACEI and FFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer