PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACAD vs. NTLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ACAD vs. NTLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) and Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACAD achieves a -19.77% return, which is significantly lower than NTLA's 44.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ACAD has outperformed NTLA with an annualized return of -5.07%, while NTLA has yielded a comparatively lower -7.63% annualized return.


ACAD

1D
2.58%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
-19.77%
6M
-17.19%
1Y
-2.50%
3Y*
-4.51%
5Y*
-1.99%
10Y*
-5.07%

NTLA

1D
-0.84%
1M
-6.13%
YTD
44.83%
6M
43.71%
1Y
69.31%
3Y*
-31.75%
5Y*
-29.01%
10Y*
-7.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACAD vs. NTLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
-19.77%45.56%-41.39%96.67%-31.79%-56.34%24.96%164.56%-46.30%4.40%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
44.83%-22.90%-61.76%-12.61%-70.49%117.35%270.82%7.47%-28.98%46.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ACAD and NTLA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2016

0.42

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACAD:

$3.70B

NTLA:

$1.54B

EPS

ACAD:

$2.20

NTLA:

-$3.58

PS Ratio

ACAD:

3.34

NTLA:

21.71

PB Ratio

ACAD:

2.97

NTLA:

2.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACAD:

$1.10B

NTLA:

$66.09M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACAD:

$758.58M

NTLA:

-$33.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACAD:

$104.56M

NTLA:

-$299.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACAD vs. NTLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACAD
ACAD Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ACAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACAD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ACAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACAD Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NTLA
NTLA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NTLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTLA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
NTLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACAD vs. NTLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) and Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACADNTLADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.07

0.73

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.17

1.51

-1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.22

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.09

0.98

-1.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.17

1.55

-1.72

ACAD vs. NTLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACAD Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the NTLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACAD and NTLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACADNTLADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

0.73

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

-0.36

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

-0.10

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

-0.07

+0.13

Drawdowns

ACAD vs. NTLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACAD drawdown since its inception was -96.29%, roughly equal to the maximum NTLA drawdown of -96.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACAD and NTLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACADNTLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.29%

-96.45%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.58%

-71.27%

+43.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.87%

-86.36%

+28.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.87%

-96.45%

+38.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.18%

-96.45%

+19.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.40%

-92.63%

+30.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.15%

-57.04%

+6.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.70%

44.93%

-30.23%

Volatility

ACAD vs. NTLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) is 10.49%, while Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) has a volatility of 18.74%. This indicates that ACAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACADNTLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

18.74%

-8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.13%

53.80%

-27.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.89%

95.55%

-58.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.51%

80.62%

-25.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.09%

78.25%

-16.16%

Dividends

ACAD vs. NTLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACAD nor NTLA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ACAD vs. NTLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M20222023202420252026
268.06M
15.05M
(ACAD) Total Revenue
(NTLA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ACAD and NTLA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTLA has higher volatility (18.74%) compared to ACAD (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACAD dropped -96.29% vs NTLA's -96.45%.

NTLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACAD and NTLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer