ACAD vs. FLNC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ACAD (ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and FLNC (Fluence Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. ACAD operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while FLNC operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities). Over the past 3 years, ACAD returned -4.51%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for FLNC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ACAD vs. FLNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACAD achieves a -19.77% return, which is significantly lower than FLNC's 25.63% return.

ACAD

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: -19.77%
• 6M: -17.19%
• 1Y: -2.50%
• 3Y*: -4.51%
• 5Y*: -1.99%
• 10Y*: -5.07%

FLNC

• 1D: -10.96%
• 1M: 101.54%
• YTD: 25.63%
• 6M: 25.19%
• 1Y: 420.96%
• 3Y*: 1.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACAD vs. FLNC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ACAD ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.	-19.77%	45.56%	-41.39%	96.67%	-31.79%	28.88%
FLNC Fluence Energy, Inc.	25.63%	24.56%	-33.42%	39.07%	-51.77%	1.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ACAD and FLNC is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021	0.27

The correlation between ACAD and FLNC shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap ACAD : $3.70B FLNC : $3.28B
EPS ACAD : $2.20 FLNC : -$0.26
PS Ratio ACAD : 3.34 FLNC : 1.52
PB Ratio ACAD : 2.97 FLNC : 8.91
Total Revenue (TTM) ACAD : $1.10B FLNC : $2.58B
Gross Profit (TTM) ACAD : $758.58M FLNC : $301.68M
EBITDA (TTM) ACAD : $104.56M FLNC : $4.46M

Return for Risk

ACAD vs. FLNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACAD

ACAD Risk / Return Rank: 36
ACAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
ACAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
ACAD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ACAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ACAD Martin Ratio Rank: 37

FLNC

FLNC Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FLNC Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FLNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FLNC Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACAD vs. FLNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) and Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACAD	FLNC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	3.37	-3.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	3.39	-3.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.44	-0.42
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	6.71	-6.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.17	13.62	-13.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACAD vs. FLNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACAD Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the FLNC Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACAD and FLNC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACAD	FLNC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07	3.37	-3.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	-0.07	+0.14

Drawdowns

ACAD vs. FLNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACAD drawdown since its inception was -96.29%, which is greater than FLNC's maximum drawdown of -90.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACAD and FLNC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACAD	FLNC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.29%	-90.40%	-5.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.58%	-63.30%	+35.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.87%	-88.40%	+30.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.40%	-33.93%	-28.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.15%	-53.85%	+3.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.70%	31.10%	-16.40%

Volatility

ACAD vs. FLNC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) is 10.49%, while Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) has a volatility of 62.52%. This indicates that ACAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLNC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACAD	FLNC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.49%	62.52%	-52.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.13%	92.96%	-66.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.89%	126.14%	-89.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.51%	98.23%	-42.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.09%	98.23%	-36.14%

Dividends

ACAD vs. FLNC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACAD nor FLNC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ACAD vs. FLNC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Fluence Energy, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ACAD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 268.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FLNC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.63M and revenue of 464.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.0%.

ACAD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported an operating income of -4.62M and revenue of 268.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.7%.

FLNC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -34.94M and revenue of 464.89M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.5%.

ACAD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported a net income of 3.64M and revenue of 268.06M, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

FLNC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluence Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -20.93M and revenue of 464.89M, resulting in a net margin of -4.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACAD and FLNC in my portfolio?

ACAD and FLNC have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACAD or FLNC?

FLNC has higher volatility (62.52%) compared to ACAD (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACAD dropped -96.29% vs FLNC's -90.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.